Sungold Media and Entertainment Limited IPO (Sungold Media Entertainment IPO) Detail

Short Term borrowings 17 crore and Long Term Borrowing 27 crore. Total borrowing 44 Cr.
Lets wait and see how hni responds. We can not go with Grey market. Grey market is one of the tool only.
We will decide on the last day after 2 pm.

@ IPOANALYSIS
DEAR
SUNGOLD IS ALREADY LISTED TODAY.
KAHA HO BHAI.
DETAIL IS AS BELOW
Previous Close :9.75            Open :9.75            High :10.25            Low :9.50

TODAY LOWER CIRCUIT WAS ALSO BREACHED.

https://www.bseindia.com/stock-share-price/sungold-media-and-entertainment-ltd/smel/541799/#

Oh yes did not realised

good to see such bad company been hammered on listing day
it deserves a value of 2 rs.

small issue. Noone knows what direction it can go.

Will be intersting to see listing. anyway the fundamentals were never good so stayaway from such stock .

tuesday listing day

Remember if operator does not come it will crash 50 pc. Check uhzaveri . Don't risk ur hard earn money in such company unless u r ready to donate 50 pc of your wealth.

Don't under stand why people want to invest there hardened money (100000) in that company whose total profit for one year is rs.2 -5 lac. What will they get from it.

Add Reliance Cap ( Rel Gen Ins is already got permission for ipo from sebi)

No reliance Nippon is already below issue price.who will apply in reliance general.insurance. all anil ambani stocks are piece of crap.

Dear Ankur,
You are correct. In DRHP it stated rel. cap. shareholder get pref. allotment like hdfc shareholder.

Dear IPOANALYSIS,
The following are the companies keep in your portfolio. One share is enough for one demat account. The following are the companies will give a pref share for their forthcoming IPO
1. L & T
2. Kotak (Kotak Sec)
3. Sbi (Gen Ins)
4. HDFC (Hdfc Sec, Hdfc Financial Ser and Ergo)
5. Axis bank (Axis Sec)
6. Tata motors (Tata Tech)

Dear Rajkumar,
Do you think that Tata tech is having share holders category for Tata motors??

Dear Athar,
Sbi.
Dear Addy A
Tata motors is a parent company. If Tata Tech coming for ipo then Tata motors may be given for shareholder pref.

RETAILERS PORTION OVERSUBSCRIBED MORE THAN NON RETAIL PORTION.
RETAILERS BECOMING MORE AGGRESSIVE NOW A DAY.
AISE HE RETAILERS LAGATE RAHEGE AND SUNGOLD TYPE K IPO AATE RAHEGE.
WAH JI WAH....

Even though will pass through as it's 1.5 correct issue but look at the worse quality.incase the operator did not come get ready for this stock to go to 5 rs as what happened to Gujarat hy spin.it is now at 6 rs

They just need 150 application to fill the issue.
Till now around only 76 application have come. high possible 15-20 application put up by employee and relatives .

I dont understand how exchange allowed such sme to come through without taking any stringent steps against the previous background

The only few application seen in retail is from company employee and relatives to be cancelled on last day

Sr.No.      Category      No. of shares bid for
1      Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs)      -
1(a)      Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs)      -
1(b)      Domestic Financial Institutions(Banks/ Financial Institutions(FIs)/ Insurance Companies)      -
1(c)      Mutual Funds      -
1(D)      Others      -
2      Non Institutional Investors      50,000
2(a)      Corporates      -
2(b)      Individuals (Other than RIIs)      50,000
2(c)      Others      -
3      Retail Individual Investors (RIIs)      2,20,000
3(a)      Cut Off      1,80,000
3(b)      Price Bids      40,000
Total      2,70,000


TOMORROW IS LAST DATE ... WHAT SAY ABOUT EXTENSION ??

I can bet the retailer few application is done by company agents only. I am unsure how bse allowed such company to collect money whose promoter has offence of culpicible homicide not amount to murder. Also yearly profit of company is same what .Any small trader earn monthly.

shaileshDodiya Aug 11, 2018 15:46
mehrasachin Aug 11, 2018 15:43
HINAMODI Aug 11, 2018 15:40
REYANSH KHATI Aug 11, 2018 15:37
Bhivan Singh Aug 11, 2018 15:32
PINALYV Aug 11, 2018 15:09
Nanjikpatel Aug 11, 2018 14:57
kinnarycshah Aug 11, 2018 14:53
jaykushal Aug 11, 2018 14:49
Above all are making the first time review with a co incident at almost same hour with few minutes gap.
ITS CALLED DIGITAL MARKETING WHICH COMPANY DOING HERE TO PROMOTE ITS IPO. BIG AVOID.
I HAVE DOUBT THAT IT MAY BE TURN OUT TO BE NEXT SALE BHAI.
MORE OVER APPLICATS WHO APPLIED IN LAST TWO DAY MAY ALSO BE BELONG TO PROMOTORS FREINDS AND RELATIVES.

Sorry read same time instead of same hour

All removed. Thank you for letting us know.

Now company will ask all agent to apply and reject application later on.nobody will be trapped

wah bhai wah.
look at shameless company agents comments which loks like cheap reply with no proper information
the management is worse with numerous cases pending. A rule should be followed that whenever there are management issues never apply in such issue

it is a penny stock. do not risk your hard earned money in such crap company . They will run away with your money. These are like chit fund company.coming to collect public money

Look at there profits . People doing Job earn more money monthly than what they earn yearly.

not even worth to comment

Fate may be like sale bhai.

I am surprised to see that IPO has been floated by the company having just Rs 44.74 Lacs turnover with profit of Rs 2.67 Lacs.

Certain of our Promoter group and our Promoter, Directors are involved in certain legal proceedings.
A. Certain of our Promoter Group and our Promoter, Directors, are involved in certain legal proceedings.
Market Regulator SEBI has imposed penalty on our Promoter, promoter group and directors for wrong
disclosure of shareholding, non disclosure as per SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulation 1992,
non disclosure as per SEBI (SAST) 1997 and violation of Section 11 C (3) read with Section 11(2) (I) of
SEBI Act 1992. The details are as follows:
Sr.
No
Name &
Relationship
Date of Order Particulars Amount
(In Rs)
1 Sungold Capital
Limited
(NOTE-1)
30th June 2017
[ADJUDICATION
ORDER NO. EAD5/SVKM/AO/49-
57/2017-18]]
Section 23E of the SCRA, 1956, for the violation of
provisions of Section 21 of SCRA read with Clause 35
of Listing Agreement, on Sungold Capital Limited,
notice no. 1 herein for wrongly classifying the
shareholding of the 'promoter group' as 'public
holding' and making wrong disclosures of the
shareholding of Ravi Rajiv Kotia.

500,000
2 Sungold Capital
Limited,
Rajiv R Kotia,
Ashok Modi,
Sharadchandra
Gandhi
(NOTE-2)
30th June 2017
[ADJUDICATION
ORDER NO. EAD5/SVKM/AO/49-
57/2017-18]
Section 15HA of the SEBI, 1992, for the violation of
provisions of Regulation 3 (d) of SEBI PFUTP
Regulations, 2003, payable jointly and severally by the
notices i.e. Sungold Capital Limited and its executive
Directors namely Shri Rajiv R Kotia, Shri Ashok Modi
and Shri Sharad Gandhi for providing false and
misleading information to the stock exchanges by
classifying the shareholding of the 'promoter group' as
'public holding'

1,000,000
3 Rajiv R Kotia in
the case of
Sungold Capital
Limited.
30th June 2017
[ADJUDICATION
ORDER NO. EAD5/SVKM/AO/49-
57/2017-18]
Section 15A (b) of the SEBI Act, 1992, for the
violation of Regulation 13 (4) read with Regulation 13
(5) of SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading)
Regulations, 1992, on the notice no. 2, Shri Rajiv R
Kotia, Promoter, Chairman & Managing Director of
Sungold Capital Limited for failure to disclose to the
Company and to the stock exchange the change in the
shareholding of his Wife and Son under the aforesaid
PIT Regulations.
12,00,000
4 Shilpa Amit Kotia,
Dhaval Ramesh
Kotia,
Shwetha Dhaval
Kotia,
Seema Rajiv Kotia,
Ravi Rajiv Kotia,
under
(NOTE-3)
30th June' 2017
[ADJUDICATION
ORDER NO. EAD5/SVKM/AO/58-
62/2017-18]
Section 15I of the SEBI Act, 1992 read with Rule 5 of
the Adjudication Rules, hereby impose, a penalty of `
10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Only) payable jointly
and severally by the notices namely Smt. Shilpa Amit
Kotia, Shri Dhaval Ramesh Kotia, Smt. Shwetha
Dhaval Kotia, Smt. Seema Rajiv Kotia and Shri Ravi
Rajiv Kotia, under Section 15A (b) of the SEBI Act,
1992, for the violation of Regulation 7 (1A) read with
Regulation 7 (2) of SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of
Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997
10,00,000
5 Sungold Capital
Limited,
19th July 2017
[ADJUDICATION
ORDER NO. EAD5/SVKM/AO/82-
86/2017-18]
Section 15I of the SEBI Act, 1992 read with Rule 5 of
the SEBI Adjudication Rules, whereby penalty is
impose, under Section 15A (a) of the SEBI Act, 1992,
for the violation of Section 11C (3) read with Section
11 (2) (I) of SEBI Act, 1992 by the notices.

500,000
6 Shilpa Amit Kotia,
Shwetha Dhaval
Kotia, Ravi Rajiv
Kotia, Seema Rajiv
19th July 2017
[ADJUDICATION
ORDER NO. EAD5/SVKM/AO/82-
Section 15I of the SEBI Act, 1992 read with Rule 5 of
the SEBI Adjudication Rules, whereby penalty is
impose under Section 15A (a) of the SEBI Act, 1992,
for the violation of Section 11C (3) read with Section

800,000

another fraud

another fraud






another misgoverned company allowed to come up with ipo.this can happen only IN India
A criminal case against Mr. Amit Rameshbhai
Kotia is pending before Metropolitan Magistrate
Court, Ahmedabad under 27/2001 (Sec 304A of
IPC i.e. Culpable Homicide not amounting to
murder). The said application has been filed by
the applicant accused u/s 439 of the criminal
procedure code and prayed for enlargement in
connection with the CR No. 1st 27/01 registered at
Sabarmati Police Station relating to the offence
punishable u/s 304, 120(B), 308 and also for the
offence u/s 3(2)(c)(d) and 7(1)(I)(II) of the


Change in Auditors during the last three (3) years
Except for appointment of M/s Bhatter & Company, Chartered Accountant, as peer review auditor, there are following
changes in our company's auditor in the last 3 years
Sr.
No
Name of Auditor or Auditor's Firm Appointment Date Appointment Reason
1 Garg & Associates 29-09-2015 As per Sec 139 and 142 of Companies
Act'2013
2 B D Saboo & Associates 26-08-2016 Fill vacancy due to resignation of
existing Statutory Auditors
3 Bhatter & Company 04-12-2017 Fill vacancy due to resignation of
existing Statutory Auditors