I stopped following RJ after he entered Compucom software @~20 , took it to ~30. From last 4-5 years it is running between 8-12. Also , see what happened to A2Z after he entered.
220.1. Mr. Singh| Link| Bookmark|
October 27, 2016 3:27:31 PM
IPO Guru (1000+ Posts, 600+ Likes)
@ 213. sajal Gupta . Crappy ....is one thing ..but such sudden, cunning change in the fundamentals has taken it to another level. .I would say it''s Creepy rather than Crappy... . If you like the rides ..or rather being taken for a ride to be precise, then you must try this one out... Should make even the likes of Fury 325 seem like picnic ..:))
Hello Mr. om. Finvest RJ is the owner/head of the co. he has to keep shares with him untill he resigns or sell his stake from the co.. Another point is that VB agreement with Pepsico till 2021 ..yes they are renewing it from 1991 but this is stock market what if they dont get it renewed . As a long term investor what is the alternative. 2. they are in this market from 1990s & still need money from equity to repay there debts... 3. further argument is that hold it for 3-6 months and it will give return but friend winter season is coming next 6 months it will earn losses ...how will short term investor make money in that scenario.. there are many points that i have but i have no fight with u i am small investor and does not have that much knowledge but both of our''s goal is that whatever we know we can share with others. Thank u
Hem Securities View: Reasons to "Avoid" The company has not shown consistency in its financial performance as in CY''13 & CY''14 co has posted losses while in CY''15 co has shown profits. Usually, first half of co is more strong then second half of any calendar year.Hence co is not expected to post strong nos in H2CY16 .Also return ratios & margin profile of company is not strong & hence unable to infuse optimism in investment profile of company. Termination or non-renewal of the PepsiCo India Agreements or the PepsiCo International Agreements or any material modification to the existing terms under such agreements adverse to co''s interest will materially and adversely affect co''s business and operations and its future financial performance. Valuation At price band of Rs 440-445,p/e multiple will turn out to be 84-85 on pre issue CY''15 eps of Rs 5.21/share (post conversion) of company. Due to unstable financials & seasonal nature of business, co is not expected to show strength in its financial performance. Also, pricing of issue looks expensive at current level. Hence, we recommend "Avoid" on issue .
Read more at: http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/ipo-issues-open/avoid-varun-beverages-ipo-hem-securities_7833761.html?utm_source=ref_article
In my view VB will give decent listing gain, subscription data far much better than PNBHF. consumption theme always give better yield than any other theme.
Entire QIB portion is from FII....check at NSE But on the other hand PNBHF both FII & omestic Financial Institutions has made applications...I am not arguing that VB is bad But i am just talking about domestic enthusiasm on this issue i.e VB
IT doesn''t matter whether Investor is FII Or DII or DMF or Any other fund. what matter is quality of Investors, Funds. Will give you recent example:- Mr. Rakesh Jhunjhunwala bought hugh quantity on ICICI Prudential, but yet to get Issue Price Mark. RJ was asked to share his view about Listing below Issued Price, than he replied It is a stock i will keep in my lifetime. it doesn''t matter where index is, Bull run, Bear run, Market at Highs or lows. "It will remain with me" its a all weather Investment.
208. Eagleye| Link| Bookmark|
October 26, 2016 6:19:05 PM
IPO Guru (6600+ Posts, 22000+ Likes)
Varun Beverages Ltd.
Day 1 at 5:00PM
QIB*: 0.88X (*Excluding Anchor) NII : 0.18X Ret : 0.11X Emp : 0.00X Total : 0.34X