there are lot of stories- shaival, DRL, CMM, Manav, SKS Textile, Pulz, Moksh, Lexus, Total, Jalan and many more.. any one investing should concentrate on company and not LM.. accident could happen with any LM..
these type of lead manager just come up as salesman .. they do not care about the company price post listing or act as good market maker or have good management companies.
there only motive is to come up with new issues to grab people money. first check ur poor track record and improve performance of previous issues before thinking to come up with new issues again and again. see how eager and desperate they are to come and rescue their issue
have u ever seen panthomath(best LM) ever come up with this cheap tactics
THIS SME IS FROM A FRAUD LEAD MANAGER WITH ALMOST 0% TRACK RECORD OF SUCCESS. BOTH ITS LAST ISSUES HAVE TRAPPED PEOPLE WHICH HAVE LOST MORE THAN 50 % OF THEIR PRICE
STAY AWAY FROM CHEATER FRAUD LEAD MANAGER, AFTER NAVIGANT AND FIRST OVERSEAS THIS ONE IS 3RD IN THE LIST OF BANNED LEAD MANAGER LIST
Mr. You also please check Touchwood, which was double in four days.. but thats not something a wise investor should look.. He should look on fundamentals which is not at all present in your analysis.. so i have serious doubts on your credentials.. do u invest only based on market price ?? Than your name should not be analysis..
first check fundamental of ur companies. SMVD have pledged its shares . it is now down 60% of issue issue price. Narmada at 33 rs is now 23 rs. shares have been pledged Ratnabhumi developer
Look at the quality of companies u as a lead manager are promoting and coming up with new issues
what fundamentals are you talking Mr This company too have IMcapital as its promoter whose stock is near all time low. IMcapital has mis governance issue where it has summon to pay in crores
what fundamentals are your talking about . Please elaborate on all ur scrips.
Just look at below pathetic record of Corporate capital .
The salesman Investorfriend urf Jigna have come here taking nonsense see how they are promoting their issue. this shows how much desperate they are in need to get issue subscribed, same strategy were followed by Navigant issues previously Now people are smarter.
nvestorfriend giving stupid examples of infosys remain undersubscribed. even after less subscription it managed to give 50% return on listing day vs ur fake sme which are down between 20 to 60%
pathetic track record of capital venture which have destroyed investor wealth
1) SMVD Issue at 55 rs is now at 20 rs. Imagine the loss for retailer despite huge oversubscription. infact it never even managed to come up above issue price ever since day of listing
2)Narmada agrobase 33 rs issue is now 23 rs . again hugely subscribed and loss to retailer 3)Touchwood is only up 20 %. at one point was also down 15 % and went to 31 rs vs issue price of 40 and now 51
Jigna u shut up u talking and i know u fake people of capital corporate coming here. u dont have any work except loot people hard earn money. all my discussions are on this sme only. so shutup and better u do ur work u new id of investorfriend urf salesman of corporate capital
Dear IPOanalysis I wish to congratulate you for having so much of in depth knowledge about everything. You must be second after god to know all truths of universe. You know who is fraud and what is bieng done.. great.. may i ask you one thing, If a LM is fraud by doing an IPO out of 5 which is trading in negative than No LM in india is fair as per your definition. As a prudent investor you should also refer other issues of LM which are trading in positive and well above issue price though in a very bad market. Are you an agent of those LMs and if not than why are u not raising your voice against all. You yourself say that SS Infra and Dhruv are trading below issue price than you shld also say that both these LMs are also fraud. Which actually is not a case with any one. This is market and it is driven by so many factors. Who knows SMVD will be a turnaround story in future. You are ruining your esteem also by making baseless allegations repeatedly, seems someone has not accepted your blackmailing and thus you are behind him. As far as pricing is concerned, if tou are that prudent and price look expensive to you, Simply dont apply. There were no takers of Infosys in 1993, i can understand a community like you exist. This is a professional forum and you are ruining the professionalism of this forum by your baseless allegations and comments. Think logically, act maturaly.. God saves you..
u r company employee from corporate capital. God save you from you type of underwiters and market makers. such type of losers who have only given loss to investors in past
i know why you are concerned that no retailer will be anyway interested in your issues in future dont compare dhruv with ur issues. Dhruv is not down 60% like ur SMVD . Dhruv has just been 1 month and near issue price now . ur SMVD is 6 montsh old and ruling at 70% discount, pathetic performance dont compare with SS INfra (Panthomath) or Dhruv(Hem)/ atleast they have multiple multibaggers in past and success ratio of more than 70%. urs issues are all down and you expect not be called fraud and cheating investors and coming up with such crap companies.
I agree with InvestorsFriend. Its funny on your part Mr. IPOANALYSIS. You again seems to prove that you are 2nd after God as you also know that he is employee of the said LM. Request you not to post baseless contentions only on the basis of your view point. Correctly said by InvestorsFriend that mkt is driven by so many factors. Be positive and have a long term view for investment. Good retailers does not look only for listing gains but have a long term view.
also i would like to correct corporate capital investorfriend id he mention that there were no takers for infosys
Dear, I know you type of people very well who try to give some previous example to trap people. but you should get ur facts very correct.
Infosys though not heavily subscribed give great returns to investor even on day1. u r comparing ur issue with SMVD which is now down 60% below issue price in 6 months and i just cant stop laughing
read below to get ur facts correct. INfosys is a gem and never made loss to anyone as u are cheating retailers with all your new issues down
Infosys made an initial public offer in February 1993 and its shares were listed on stock exchanges in India in June 1993. Trading opened at Rs. 145 per share, compared to the IPO price of Rs. 95 per share. In October 1994, Infosys made a private placement of 5,50,000 shares at Rs. 450 each to Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs), Financial Institutions (FIs) and body corporates. In March 1999, it issued 20,70,000 ADSs (equivalent to 10,35,000 equity shares of par value of Rs. 10 each) at US$34 per ADS under the American Depositary Shares Program and the same were listed on the NASDAQ National Market. All the above data is unadjusted for issue of stock split and bonus shares. During July 2003, June 2005 and November 2006, it made successful secondary ADR issues of US$294 million, US$1.07 billion and US$1.605 billion respectively.
Good ones. I consider them good if they have total of 60% success rate 1)Panthomath 2)Hem swastika is good as well and comes to nearby that one. systematic too have atleast given great retruns for listing gain
Now below are the worst lead manager as they have no multibagger as well as their issue caused huge loss to retailer. inspite of 5-10 issues most of them have given loss on listing as well as in long run
1) Navigant 2) corporate capital 3) first overseas
If you dont believe me just check and compare all their issues both in terms of listing price as well as CMP
I already told to boycott above 3 LM as a must
Noone can be 100% correct or is a God investorfriend
I am saving retailer from LM like u who took investor money from retailer thinking they can keep coming up with new issues everytime and not knowing the background history of such LM Thats why it is very important nowdays for SEBI to mark performance of LM soon In this way all bad LM will disappear
below message is for investorfriend who is from corporate capital. look how the salesman is used to write things. do you think big companies come to write such things.
Open your eyes against such lead manager who are like salesman hired to trap innocent retailers
Everyone look at how corporate capital employee have come to write comments
God save people from such lead manager and underwiters osf issue He mention SS Infra(Panthomath) and Dhruve(Hem) as bad but let me clear his facts.
BOth Panthomath and Hem have made a name for themselves. Check their issue they still have more than 70% success and multiple multibaggers.do yo want me to name their multibaggers. inspite of so many issues they have manage to give great returns to investors in past and have come up wiuth Genuine companies and great investment.
Now let me get to your pathetic track record of capital venture which have destroyed investor wealth
1) SMVD Issue at 55 rs is now at 20 rs. Imagine the loss for retailer despite huge oversubscription. infact it never even managed to come up above issue price ever since day of listing
2)Narmada agrobase 33 rs issue is now 23 rs . again hugely subscribed and loss to retailer
3)Ratnabhumi developer 63 rs is now at 43 rs
4)shsish industries at same issue price
Now just look at yuor track record. With only 5 issues of ur corporate capital you have not even managed to get 3 giving huge loss and 1 around issue price
with such track record you compare urself with infosys.
dont compare ur such companies with Infosys. If infosys management listens they will be laughing too much. No one is able to digest your news. the way you have come in this forum itself shows how corporate capital is eager and want retailer money to trap them again and again.
Investor first .reason we should not at all.invest in rudra sme. 1). All recent consultancy firm like dhruv and SS infra gone down 2) SS infra and dhruv have more order book 3). Dhruv won 2 orders recently and stock is still ruling at 25 pc discount 4) SS infra is available at less than half it's pe than what rudra priced 5) look how these company salesman are hired to write these comments as they fear there issue needs to find bakra. 6) the similar strategy was applied by agents in sirca paints 7) he is giving wrong information please recheck correctly rudra has only 130 crore order and u stated incorrect fact of 200 which is not even there in the prospectus 8) they are base this incorrect for pe 8) check Dilip sir comments he has given 27 pe which is correct way to calculate pe and not yes one which is fake
Who so ever say that S S infra and Dhruv are comparable.. you must understand that REPL has so many verticals.. One stand for S S infra another for Dhruv another for Softech other for Riding and so many.. you dont have an exact comparable of this company and thats make this different from others.. a prudent investor will understand..
How you calculate PE.. may i ask.. the company has earned a profit of 5.30 Cr in 2018 and the EPS is around 4.30 thus the IPo Price is well below 10 PE..
huge cash will be paid to few broker/HNI to apply and show subscription. they can even sell at huge discount of 20%. this strategy is now known and to make retailer fool as they look at subscription .
Do you work upon cash back system.. than you should not be here.. giving lecture on who is fraud and who is Not.. you yourself is illusion if you are not an investor..
Everyone just remember Corporate is same lead manager as Navigant they are also good marketing agents. if you see SMVD, Narmada were hugely subscribed. same happens with issues of Navigant as well
they are fraud lead manager. they will just want issues to be subscribed and act as agents. they are very good salesman but after issue is closed they damn care about the issue and no underwiters or market maker is available
Always remember stay away from fraud Lead manager.
NAVIGANT , FIRST OVERSEAS AND CORPORATE. THESE 3 ARE FRAUDS AND THERE ONLY WORK IS PROMOTING THEIR ISSUES THGROUGH SALESMAN
If three are fraud whole system is fraud.. name anyone.. i can give example of fraud.. who is Fair here.. all those who want an SME to give 20% return on listing day are also fraud.. ask Exchanges do Reliance and Tata were build in 6 months.. what a prudent investor you are..
SMVD gave more than expected results.. who are you a valued investor or a market manipulator.. what best a company can do.. it can do business.. and that is supposed to be doing..
I think SEBI should have some kind of performance matrix so retailer just stay away from such
It is down 3 % even on listin day.
Look at investorfriend company agents ran away post listing. they are succesful people as they got issue subscribed SMDV from 55 rs is now at 20 rs. Imagine the loss to retailer. He menbtion about Infosys which on day 1 was up 55%