Price band is 310-317. But the first default bid accepts only higher price band by default - 317 and it''s grayed out, I can''t edit. Is this always the case, we HAVE to bid for higher price band first? So I applied two bids : 45 X 317 45 X 311 Is this valid?
Please do some maths before rushing to subscribe. Revenue 3400 cr, Employees 120000, revenue per employee < 3 Lakhs. In order to sustain their business their cost per employee needs to be less than 1.5 L per annum, which is 12500 Rs per month. Add to salary inflation and attrition challenges. They are mainly a blue collar service provider company. PE of 41. With 7th pay commission they can not sustain their cost. No way this company can grow at 30% YOY in next 5 years (that is when you are rushing to buy at PE of 41 with expecting a gain of 30% on listing - PE 52). Please avoid this issue.
It will apply to all companies who have to match the salary parity in the industry for their competitiveness. Since they are blue collar personnel provider, it impacts them at maximum level
Hmmm...good point Ajay. Definatly something to ponder on. However, since retail portion is less and mkt sentiment good then maybe if u apply n r lucky enough then u can reap listing gains.
Forget about 7PC Adarsh. The main point that it is overpriced remains valid. Entering at 45x PE & expecting it to list at 55-60 PE should baffle any analytical mind especially when we have some hindsight (remember Teamlease''s low single digit net profit margin & EPS growth of low double digits vs 55x PE it was issued at?).
As Ajay rightly points out, it''s very difficult to maintain 30% EPS growth going forward.
IPOs are mostly (not always) gambling events. I welcome those who choose to remain sane in such frenzy.
Apply if you must, but there is no need to unnecessarily justify it! I''ll most likely (not sure, though) buy 2 Quess lottery tickets tomorrow myself.
I am new to the IPO/Stock market. when the ipo is over subscribed. Can any one tell me that it is advisable to apply with less number of lots but multiple applications with different applicant or single application with full lots. For. E.g - I have 2 Lakh rupees to invest in Quest then - 1. Should i apply 1 lakh rupees on my name and my wife names OR 2. Apply 2 lakh rupees on my name only. In which case the chances of allotment are more. Thanks in Advance.
In case of oversubscription apply in different names. You will get only 1 lot (in lottery basis). So multiple application (in different names) increases your chances. The Retail category for Quess IPO is already 50% full, so it might be oversubscribed upto 5x.
I am new to the IPO/Stock market. when the ipo is over subscribed. Can any one tell me that it is advisable to apply with less number of lots but multiple applications with different applicant or single application with full lots. For. E.g - I have 2 Lakh rupees to invest in Quest then - 1. Should i apply 1 lakh rupees on my name and my wife names OR 2. Apply 2 lakh rupees on my name only. In which case the chances of allotment are more. Thanks in Advance.
If IPO is over subscribed, why do you want to block 1 lakh rupees, apply only for single lot from your account and your wife account which will increase to get allotment. So you need to apply differently from your PAN no and your wife''s PAN no.
As on 31 March 2016, revenue breakup- domestic 85.71%, international 14.29%.
Our service and product offerings include four broad operational segments with revenue breakup-
Global Technology Solutions (“GTSâ€) 26.77%, People and Services (“P&Sâ€) 56.64% , Integrated Facility Management (“IFMâ€) 10.82% and Industrial Asset Management (“IAMâ€) 5.61%.
Three companies and entities acquired by us were or continue to be loss making, have negative operating profits, or have a negative net worth, which matters may not be fully reflected in our Restated Consolidated Financial Statements. For instance, Brainhunter incurred losses of CAD 2.00 million (INR 99.92 million) in Fiscal 2016, experienced negative cash flows from operating activities, and had a shareholder’s deficiency as at March 31, 2015 and as at March 31, 2016. In the period between November 3, 2014 and March 31, 2015 and Fiscal 2016, MFX incurred losses after tax of US$ 4.00 million (INR 250.39 million) and US$ 2.00 million (INR 132.25 million), respectively, and as of March 31, 2016, MFX had negative net worth of US$ 8.69 million (INR 574.61 million).
145. Eagleye| Link| Bookmark|
June 29, 2016 11:31:29 AM
IPO Guru (6600+ Posts, 21900+ Likes)