CMS Info Systems Limited IPO Message Board (Page 5)

Ha ha ha !!! I should also have tried that way !!

Both of my upi mandate request got timed out while accepting via phonepe yes bank and then mandate failed , no idea what was the issue. Lets see on listing day how it will gonna be.

Dear Admin वो likes वाला प्रोब्लम सॉल्व हो गया है तो ये फॉर्मूला बहोत ही अच्छा है। और suggetion था कि हर IPO guru को compulssery month में एक अच्छे स्टॉक का suggestion देना ही होगा (just joking)

Sounds Good

Looks good 👍👍

Dear Team,
I think in Existing, if I am not wrong, a correction is found necessary.
Top Contributor: 200 to 499/500
IPO Mentor: 500/ 501 to 1000
I would like to suggest the following changes.
Top Contributor: 500 to 999 with not less than 400 likes
IPO Mentor: 1000 to 1999 with not less than 800 likes
IPO Guru: 2000 to 3999 with not less than 1600 likes
IPO Supreme: 4000 onwards with not less than 3000 likes
If for any reason one’s contribution is missing for more than 9 months, his ranking may be resumed only after adding the period of missing to the day of resuming of posting.
Thank you for your consideration of the proposal for examining the necessity of reviewing the ranking in view of the possible increased tendency in posting. I wholeheartedly appreciate your readiness to revise the process, wherever necessary. Please keep it up.

@Team Chittorgarh.com: I guess you can avoid hard-coding count of Likes and keep it as a ratio of Posts.

Checkout pseudo code below=>
rank = ""
if posts > 1500:
pl_ratio = posts / likes
rank = (pl_ratio >= 2) ? "IPO Guru" : (pl_ratio 500:
pl_ratio = posts / likes
rank = (pl_ratio 200:
rank = "Top Contributor"

print("Rank:")

The contributor should have minimum 500 posts... I have a Top contributor badge for 200+ posts which is totally undeserved. There should be some audit on the Admin''s behalf so that messages like

Whats the GMP?
ASBA or UPI?
What are your views? Etc

Are NOT counted towards the message count.

The badge awarding should not be automatic but be reviewed by the Admin. Please do remove / reallocate existing badges as per the new policy formulated by you.

IPO Gurus/ Mentors to have a facility to delete their own messages and put messages by others in the bin for YOUR review... You may reinstate those messages or delete them if u so wish. In the interim, they would be out of the public view and marked for moderation.

@admin
Make provision to leave "tag" voluntarily and can be able to post as individual , normal participate

And first remove my tag

I assume this is being looked into as admin may be feeling that current system is being misused
You having access to raw data would know more about nature of abuse. try to curb that else even new system can be abused too

A suggestion
Rather than rank being given on numbers you keep these number internal and validate your ranking

2nd suggestion
Impalement new system from Jan 1, 2022. Keep current rank with an * (asterisk). From July 1, 2022 give new ranks basis data from Jan 1, 2022

My previous post got messed up, I think because of how the forum software interprets colons. So reposting without colons. Dots are spaces.

rank = ""
if posts > 1500
....pl_ratio = posts / likes
....rank = "IPO Guru" if (pl_ratio >= 2) else ( "Top Contributor" if (pl_ratio 500
....pl_ratio = posts / likes
....rank = "Top Contributor" if (pl_ratio 200
....rank = "Top Contributor"

print("Rank=")

I''m perfectly OK too like Harit if my badge is removed. These badges cause more issues than benefits I feel. Having a vintage ( member since 20**) and listing number of posts / likes is also more than enough.

Also, remove the facility to like your own MESSAGES. Have seen some msgs saying " What''s the GMP?" with 5 likes 😂

Kuchh Gift bhi milne chahiye tag pane walo ko.

2nd Post also messed up by forum software. Hence I give up !

@Admin team, good efforts to differentiate the people who has contributed more to the forum by including the likes also. Please leave the tag optional to the member if they want to display or not as I felt that some good people are hesitating to share their good opinions also because of the tag

@ Team chittorgarh

1) As there is a provision for a like so there should be a provision for dislike.
It will make the matter more interesting and represent the true picture of likes and dislikes of the member which will further create an opportunity for rectification of our behaviour.

@mvsmr ji
That''s my point also
Tag create differences between other members,
Market is always a learning process.

Make it optional

Keep or leave

Please

Very good

Strongly Agreed - Add my vote for optional Tag.

One more suggestion. If we can give option to follow the member and ability to filter messages per whom I follows. This will give more power to individual members to filter out unwanted messages.

This will even gives power to individual member to decide whom they consider as GURU...

Thank you all for suggestions. Please keep them coming.

@Nexus, You could share your ideas at support@chittorgarh.com in case difficulties posting the code.

Tag is not needed. Just showing no of days/months on the forum and likes should be sufficient.

Dear Admin, TAG is defintely a motivation for the members to post the messages.. request to continue to have it .. but few people are misusing it.. This can be stopped with number of years the member in the forum..

Existing system is fine, only please provide a member a tag if the count and likes is greater than the number you have decided and member should be at least 5 years in chittorgarh to get a Tag ..

This way people can not misuse the system...

Right decision.

There is no differentiation in Ranks for those who post 200-1500 posts,
All will be ranked "Top Contributors"

Revised Proposal :-
-------------------------------------
Post Likes Rank
> 1500 > 3000 IPO Guru
> 1500 1000-3000 IPO Mentor
> 1500 1000 Mentor
500-1500 200 Contributor

Yeah... Hez got a point - Active hours spent shud be reflected in each profile separately

My earlier message got truncated

Revised Proposal :-
----------------------------------
Post Likes Rank
> 1500 > 3000 IPO Guru
> 1500 1000-3000 IPO Mentor
> 1500 1000 Mentor
500-1500 200 Contributor

My full msg gets truncated every time, any how i will limit the characters used in the msg by proposing the following 6 posts for consideration :-

1. IPO Guru
2. IPO Mentor
3. IPO Guide
4. Mentor
5. Top Contributor
6. Contributor

Admn.,
It may also please be examined the feasibility of adding “ Member since……………. “ to the tag. Thank you.

@Admin. Giving ranks make your site popular, you can change or remove them that''s your wish. But try to improve Quality of posts and relevant comments. It''s difficult but can be done. Add new features like Edit so person can correct typographical errors.

@ADMIN @Team Chittorgarh: i feel better you decide it yourself :)
I think No. of "Likes" always cant be the criteria to decide about tag, and it may increase group-ism and jealous feelings and sometimes 1 normal poem may get 30 likes or 1 normal quote can get more than 10 likes and some people getting 16 likes on their single word "NO" reply, we all know how, and many more examples like in arguments, rude posts also gets more likes or too much polite gyan giving posts also may get too many likes (all these without any relation with market/ipo-knowledge etc). And initially many members simply might be asking many things on forum so posts count increases but its without getting likes, like @learner but he is indirectly learning and gaining experience here.

Best is to use no. of posts + experience in chittorgarh site. And removing tag should also not be a option, i can understand @harit point since many times people keep blaming and pointing out, but that''s ok, whoever is present here from long time, knows the intentions/nature of everyone, we should not be worry with such things. I feel below would be fine to make changes.
Above 200 post: some new tag like IPO guide with min 6 months on site.
Above 500 post - Top Contributor with min 1 year on site
Above 1000 posts - Top Mentor with min 2 years on site
Above 1500 posts - IPO Guru with min 3 years on site

or it can be a combination of all three too....posts + time on site + likes.
you can adjust counts for all these three things, to decide member tag, which as per you is looking best. OR only or only or only , whatever you feel is best, to decide, is fine.

words inside greater than and smaller than signs were not posted above, no idea why. Sorry for inconvenience and spam. Posting again here.

or it can be a combination of all three too....posts + time on site + likes.
you can adjust counts for all these three things, to decide member tag, which as per you is looking best. OR only (posts+likes) or only (posts + time on site) or only (posts count) , whatever you feel is best, to decide, is fine.

@lokes Sir,
Thank you for your feedback.
''Members'' age on the forum'' is another good metric for ranking. But adding 3rd metrics makes it a little more complicated.

Pls put three columns in excel and try the rank. The challenge is, we can''t miss out on people in between.

For example:
How would you rank a member who is above 1500 posts but doesn''t meet one of the other criteria?

@Team Chittorgarg: ya fine, as per your convenience, it can be decided.
But as i said: "you can adjust counts for all these three things, to decide member tag, which as per you is looking best." Means member age can be done even 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year. Now if someone is having more than 1500 posts and having less than a year on site, then giving guru tag might not be relevant too, means that is more into general discussions. Same way for likes. I mean posts can be made main criteria, remaining two(age+likes - if you choose both) or remaining one (likes or age whichever you choose) can have lesser benchmarks numbers.

1. IPO Guru: (>1500 Posts), (>3000 Likes)
2. IPO Mentor: (>1500 Posts), (2000-3000 Likes)
3. IPO Guide: (>1500 Posts), (1000-2000 Likes)
4. Mentor: (>1500 Posts), (200-1000 Likes)
5. Top Contributor (500-1500 Posts), 200 Likes
6. Contributor: (200-500) Posts

Revised Proposal... Added Wizard and Guru.

1. IPO Guru: (>1500 Posts), (>3000 Likes)
2. IPO Guide: (>1500 Posts), (2000-3000 Likes)
3. IPO Wizard: (>1500 Posts), (1000-2000 Likes)
4. IPO Mentor: (>1500 Posts), (200-1000 Likes)
5. Top Contributor (500-1500 Posts), 200 Likes
6. Contributor: (200-500) Posts


Contributor doesn''t necessarily have likes as this would boost them to post new info.

´Member since´ to see how old the member is
Click/hover over the ´like´ should show who exactly has liked that post
Allowed to give ´likes´ only if you have been a member for a minimum period of time (say 3 months)

Over 2000 post over 2000 likes = MAHAGURU

@ultrasnow: first and last line thing is ok/fine, but middle one will again increase (or give chance for) arguments or groupism etc neither its good in such sites. its not some social networking site to show likes name :)
@cautious proprio : good one ;) :)
@Admin: I was continuous getting alert mails for replies in this thread since i forgot to untick in "Track replies" while posting last message, i am unticking now "Track replies" option, i hope now i won''t get mails and this thing has been implemented now as i mentioned this previously.

Over 4000 post & over 4000 likes = SARVGYANI.

@Admin,, Please don''t make it so stringent that it discourage new members. Don''t tilt the scale in favor of old members.


Few Suggestions :
**Also put a dislike/thumbs down button so as to give negative rating, in case the message posted by a member is misleading and spam.


**Also a number of time a member has been mentioned /called for giving its views should also be one of the criteria.

Thanks

How we can check that how many post we have done and also how many likes we have got?

I have personally experienced the following:

1. Most of the members with Tags and Genuine knowledge have left the forum.
2. Some of the members with Tag have influenced the opinion on the forum to benefit a small group of people.
3. New members posting unnecessary messages to get tags
4. Rain of "Likes" on a message which had only 1-3 words.
5. New member feeling antagonism with Tagged members
6. Tagged members making fun of New Members.
7. Member forming groups and facilitating tags for each other directly or indirectly.

etc..etc ..etc

I personally don''t value tags.....I value the right opinion of the individuals who really have the real experience of the markets......for rest of comedy we already have paid news channel with buckets full of analysts.....

So Tags or No Tags or what kinda tags.....I believe Chittorgarh will be doing what generates benefits for them directly or indirectly and I am absolutely fine with that. Will adapt to whatever the final decision is

Respected members we may give tag as
.My suggestion is
Rank. No of post. Like %
Ipo guru. . Min 1000. 80%
Mentor. Min 1000. 70%
Contribution. Min. 500. 60%

Option to add proof with screenshots when someone makes out of the ordinary
claim that can materially affect decisions of retail investors
Regulars are a trusted lot but when for e.g someone claimed he applied 2700 sme ipo lots he should attach relevant proof if requested

Proposed new rule
> 3000 IPO Guru

Ish proposed new rule se ek 1200 like wale Guru ji ko tag chhin jane ka dar sata raha hai. "Like" characteria na ban jaye ish k against main 5/6 post kar chuke hain.

25/30 post daily kar k Guru ka tag hasil karna to bahut hi aasaan hai par like kahan se layen.

Admin se nivedan hai ki koi v foumula lagaye par Bhai sahab se Guru ka tag na Chhene. Exceptional case bana kar v Guru hi rehne den.

Waise aapka proposal achchha aur lagu karne yog hai.

Request Admin not to deactivate a Guru or Mentor or top contributor from the "ranked member list".. we should always appreciate their contributions to the forum even if they are not active recently due to various reasons.. it will motivate senior people to come back...

@admin I would also like to bring to your notice that i have noticed a few members ( a few of them with badges) spamming messages and garnering likes through fake accounts. A few of them also create a thread of discussion among themselves and try to abuse the badge system currently in place. It was quite evident to me as most of their simple, lame messages end up getting numerous likes. I have noticed a few names but would not like to publicly name them.

There is a reason why respected members like Aniketiaf, owls eye, rajakumar, arjun rajkot, eagle eye, sonal patel and others have vanished or limited their activity because this forum is turning into a commercial fish market. If you check the message board across multiple IPOs, you''ll definitely find repeat offenders spamming messages. Out of 10-15 threads in a page you will hardly find 4-5 relevant and productive discussion threads. There needs to be some kind authority badge members enjoy like providing them the right to mark a message as spam posted by any member ( be it a badge member or non badge member ) which is ultimately looked into by the admin.
Admin if you have the time, kindly look into this.

@mog,
If you find such members or messages pls report or send email to support@chittorgarh.com

@Admin
Everything new is always welcomed to make the forum more interesting n useful. You can decide it on the feedback received n your internal team’s review. I would like to add one point that you should also mention number of years of the member since joining this forum like IPO Guru (1000+ posts, 2500+ likes, 5 years).
I hope you understand my point.
Thanks and regards
🙏🙏

One more point is that currently so many IPOs are opened so main focus must be on IPOs and such discussion should be in non IPO days so that on that time also forum will be more active.
Thanks

perfect. guru should be defined by likes. great

Do away with guru etc tags and number of likes, when you click on member name it should show member registered date and his/her threads, comments (reddit like design)
A link to ‘new posts’ since last login, even better if it shows against the particular IPO on front page. So we know where currently a discussion is taking place, ‘trending’ like feature
Improve search feature, for e.g looking for hni thread one has to scroll page wise
Interactive well designed mobile app please

Dear admin
Just checking the ranked member list, as per your draft rule, we will have only 4 ipo guru , eagleeye, aniketiaf, king vinod, harit...

Old some member return this forum,so his all benifit all this forum followers...& request to all member respect to sinior member...I m not interested tag,guru,mentor ets

Viraj..

Please take out those who share false information with the intent to mislead people!

@Admin,
Presently, IPO mentor is one with 500 + posts, correction there.
The following is my suggestion:
IPO Contributor : 250+ posts
IPO Mentor: 500+ posts, 1000+ likes
IPO Guru: 1000+ posts, 500+ posts on stocks coming true, 2000+ likes
IPO Expert: 2000+ posts, 1000+ posts on stocks coming true, 4000+ likes
Any member not posting for one year to be removed and to be recounted afresh.

Tag based on LIKES ALONE is preferable.

@Admin
Please do not consider anything not related to IPO GMP or newly listed stocks as posts as many posts are related to allotments or non allotment and refunds, which are required to be addressed somewhere else.

@Team Chittorgarh!
I think you are overwhelmed by plenty of ideas /responses from the members.
To make your work simple, I would like to give an idea...
Retain only the tags of old members who came forward and gave ''apply'' or ''avoid'' suggestion for this IPO and remove tags of rest of them!
😜😜😂😂

Dear Admin,
One of the reason for changing ranking system due number of rank holders increased recently. I would suggest below simple logic.
Continue to have same logic for deciding rank based on number of posts. So that it remain as simple process.
But increase the threshold limit, so that it becomes tough to get a rank and will remain for some more time.. He is my suggestion:

Existing Ranking:
---------------------------
Post Rank
>1000 IPO Guru
400-1000 IPO Mentor
200-400 Top Contributor

Existing Ranking:
---------------------------
Post Rank
>2000 IPO Guru
1000-2000 IPO Mentor
500-1000 Top Contributor

A new Rank may be added as IPO Mahaguru , if number of posts is greater than 5000.

Dear Members,

We are reading all the suggestions posted in this thread. We will finalize the approach in the next couple of weeks.

Until then, thank you for your help.

Pls, continue sharing your ideas/suggestions and feedbacks.

Looking at the weak demand, I have skipped the IPO. Almost everyone who wants to hold for the long term will get their shares in the IPO, while those who buy only for the listing pop will sell, no matter at what price it lists. I would be very surprised if it doesn''t list at a discount, but it is your money. Make your own decision based on your view on the company and your risk tolerance.

it''s 4:30 pm for ICICIDirect

2Adesh ji The error message saying the IPO has closed only comes at the final stage after you have allocated funds for the IPO. So, this experiment doesn''t prove anything.